Does the virgin birth mean he wasn't of David's bloodline as the Prophecy required? This is something Jews bring up a lot, basically the prophecy in Isaiah requires Jesus be of David's bloodline yet Jesus' virgin birth seemingly means he isn't technically of the bloodline.
For follow-up discussion and general commentary on the topic. Comments are sorted chronologically.
The Old Testament represents a copying and shadow of the reality
Adam represents the one to come and and she was named Eve meaning the mother of all the living Romans 5:14 Nevertheless, death reigned from the time of Adam to the time of Moses, even over those who did not sin by breaking a command, as did Adam, who is a pattern of the one to come.
Abraham although he was old he did the Lord's work and he followed Gods law he did have a child with Hagar which was Ishmael but God said that he would have a son and named him Isaac with Sarah and although he was old and it was not believable to others it was just as YHUH said. .....
It was Isaac who inherited the blessings he's the son of the woman who is not in bondage and she is free Galations 4:23 The son of the slave wife was born in a human attempt to bring about the fulfillment of God's promise. But the son of the freeborn wife was born as God's own fulfillment of his promise
Galation 4:26 Jerusalem that is above is free and she is our mother....
The 2nd coming will bring our heavenly mother
Revelations 21:2. I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband.
I do believe the second coming has already happened by the prophecy of the fig tree
Matthew 24:32. The Lesson of the Fig Tree
31And He will send out His angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather His elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other.